Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖº¯ °ñÈí¼ö ¾ç»ó¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í °ñÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»ê¿¡ °üÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼®

Influence of bone loss pattern on stress distribution in bone and implant: 3D-FEA study

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 48±Ç 2È£ p.111 ~ 121
ÀÌÁ¾Çõ, ±è¼ºÈÆ, ÀÌÀçºÀ, ÇÑÁß¼®, ¾çÀçÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁ¾Çõ ( Lee Jong-Hyuk ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±è¼ºÈÆ ( Kim Sung-Hun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÀçºÀ ( Lee Jai-Bong ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÇÑÁß¼® ( Han Jung-Suk ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¾çÀçÈ£ ( Yang Jae-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖº¯ °ñÈí¼ö ¾ç»óÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í ÁÖº¯°ñÀÇ ÀÀ·Â ºÐ»ê¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ ¼öÆò °ñÈí¼ö¿Í ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖº¯ ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö¿¡ À־ ÁÖº¯°ñÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»ê, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æÀÇ Çü¼º°ú ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀÇ º¯È­ °ü°è ¹× º´ÀûÀÎ °ñÈí¼ö½ÃÀÇ ÁÖº¯°ñ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¸¦ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ¿ìÃø Á¦ 1 ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ Àü¹æ¿¡¼­ Á¦ 2 ´ë±¸Ä¡ ÈĹæ±îÁöÀÇ ÇϾǰñ ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÏ°í Á÷°æ 4.0 mm, ±æÀÌ 10.0 mmÀÇ ³ª»çÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ Á¦ 1 ´ë±¸Ä¡ ºÎÀ§¿¡ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÆò ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼öÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸±â À§ÇÏ¿© °ñÈí¼ö°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾ÊÀº ÇüŸ¦ ´ëÁ¶±º (I)À¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, 1.5 mm ¼öÆò °ñÈí¼ö (H1.5), 3.0 mm ¼öÆò °ñÈí¼ö (H3.0) ¸ðÇü°ú ÀÌ¿¡ »óÀÀÇÏ´Â ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö ¸ðÇü (VW1.5: 1.5 mm, VW3.0: 3.0 mm)À» ¼³°èÇÏ¿´°í, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æÀÇ Çü¼º°ú ÀÀ·Â º¯È­¸¦ °üÂûÇϱâ À§ÇØ »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æÀÌ Çü¼ºµÇ´Â °úÁ¤À» °¡Á¤ÇѸðÇü(B0: ÇÇÁú°ñ¿¡¼­ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿ÍÀÇ °ñÀ¯ÂøÀÌ ¾øÀÌ ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÏ°Ô Á¢ÃËµÈ »óÅÂ, B1: ÇÇÁú°ñ¿¡ 0.5 mm ÆøÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ »óÅÂ)°ú »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æÀÌ Çü¼ºµÈ »óÅ (B2)ÀÇ ¸ðÇüÀ» ¼³°èÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æÀÌ Çü¼ºµÈ »óÅ´ 0.5 mm ÆøÀ» °¡Áö¸ç ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀåÃà¿¡ °æ»çÁø ÇüŸ¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â 1.5 mm ±íÀÌÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö »óÅ·ΠÇü¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. º´Àû °ñÈí¼ö »óÅ´ ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö¸¦ °¡Á¤ÇÑ ±âÁ¸ ¸ðÇü (VW1.5, VW3.0)°ú °ñÈí¼ö°¡ ´õ ÁøÇàµÈ VW4.5, ±âÀúºÎ¿¡ ÇÇÁú°ñÈ­°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁöÁö ¸øÇÑ VO3.0, VO4.5, VO6.0¸ðÇüÀ» Ãß°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÏÁßÁ¶°ÇÀº ¼öÁ÷, ¼öÆòÇÏÁß ±×¸®°í ÇùÃø 45??°æ»çÇÏÁßÀ» °¢°¢ 100 N¾¿ ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹° ºÎÀ§¿¡ °¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¼öÆò °ñÈí¼ö¿Í ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö¿¡ À־ Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Å©±â¿Í ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ °¡ÇØÁö´Â ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Å©±â´Â ¼­·Î ´ëÀÀÇÏ´Â ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ À¯»çÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö¿¡¼­ ¼öÁ÷·ÂÀ» ¹ÞÀ» ¶§ C2¿¡¼­ C4·Î 1.5 mmÀÇ °ñÈí¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª °ñ¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·ÂÀº ¿ÀÈ÷·Á °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö¿¡¼­ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ °á¼ÕºÎÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ º®À» ÅëÇØ »óºÎ·Î ºÐ»êµÇ´Â °ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. »ý¹°ÇÐÀû Æø°æ Çü¼º ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ °¡ÇØÁö´Â °æ¿ì ÇÇÁú°ñ¿¡¼­ÀÇ °áÇÕÀÌ ¾ø´Â A2¿¡¼­ ÇÇÁú°ñ Àü¹Ý¿¡ ³ôÀº ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç »ý¹°ÇÐ
Àû Æø°æÀÇ ¿Ï¼ºÀ» °¡Á¤ÇÑ B1¿¡¼­´Â ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ °æ°è¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ °æ»çÁø ÇÇÁú°ñÀ» µû¶ó¼­ ÆÛÁ®³ª°¡°í ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿´´Ù. º´Àû °ñÈí¼ö¿¡¼­ °ñ°á¼ÕºÎ ÇϹ濡 ÇÇÁú°ñÀÌ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì´Â °ñÈí¼ö¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇÏ¿© ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Áõ°¡ ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÇÇÁú°ñÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ °ñÈí¼ö·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡¿Í ºñ·ÊÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½À» º¸¿´´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖº¯ °ñÈí¼öÀÇ ¾çÀÌ °°¾Æµµ Èí¼öµÈ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶ó ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Å©±â¿Í ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»êÀÌ ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç Ãʱ⠰ñÈí¼ö Çö»óÀº ÇÇÁú°ñ°úÀÇ °áÇÕÀÌ ¾àÇÒ ¶§ ÀÌ ºÎÀ§¿¡ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ¾î ³ªÅ¸³ª¸ç, ÀÌÈÄ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ °¨¼ÒµÇ¾î ÆòÇüÀ» ÀÌ·ç´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ °æ¿ì ÇÇÁú°ñÀÇ Á¸Àç À¯¹«°¡ ÀÀ·Â ºÐ»ê¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡¸ç ÇÇÁú°ñÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ÀÏÁ¤ ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ °¨¼Ò°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»ê¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÑ ÇüÅ¿¡¼­ °ñÈí¼öÀÇ ÁøÇàÀ» °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ. (´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2010;48:111-21)

Purpose: This 3D-FEA study was performed to investigate the influence of marginal bone loss pattern around the implant to the stress distribution.

Material and methods: From the right second premolar to the right second molar of the mandible was modeled according to the CT data of a dentate patient. Teeth were removed and an implant (¬æ 4.0 ¡¿ 10.0 mm) was placed in the first molar area. Twelve bone models were created: Studied bone loss conditions were horizontal bone loss and vertical bone loss, assumed bone loss patterns during biologic width formation, and pathologic vertical bone loss with or without cortification. Axial, buccolingual, and oblique force was applied independently to the center of the implant crown. The Maximum von Mises stress value and stress contour was observed and von Mises stresses at the measuring points were recorded.

Results: The stress distribution patterns were similar in the non-resorption and horizontal resorption models, but differed from those in the vertical resorption models. Models assuming biologic width formation showed altered stress distribution, and weak bone to implant at the implant neck area seams accelerates stress generation. In case of vertical bone resorption, contact of cortical bone to the implant may positively affect the stress distribution.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ®;ÀÀ·ÂºÐ»ê;À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®;¼öÆò °ñÈí¼ö;¼öÁ÷ °ñÈí¼ö
Implant;Finite element analysis;Stress distribution;Vertical bone loss;Horizontal bone loss

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed